Archive for the Category » Physics «

Tuesday, April 21st, 2009 | Author: admin

The first Universal Law, as stated by Edgar Cayce, the sleeping prophet is this: If a particular situation is in your life, it is there because you put it there. Your thoughts, words, and/or actions have created your life as it is at this moment in time and space. Do you like where you are? Do you enjoy the people and situations that surround you? If so, I congratulate you on a job well done. You have mastered your mind and consciously created your wonderful life.

If you do not like what your life is, you are likely in this situation because you have unconsciously accepted beliefs, generally belonging to, and taught to you by others. Your subconscious, your electromagnetic field, your aura, your quantum resonance field -whatever name you choose to use- is attracting experiences into your life based on the beliefs and/or warnings of others that likely were subconsciously accepted by you as fact, when you were small. You very likely accepted these beliefs as a child when people, who were trying to protect you, told you things like, “be careful” “don’t take unnecessary, foolhardy risks” “don’t talk to strangers” and the like.

These, and so many other warnings we hear as children, from well-meaning people with only our best interests at heart, are accepted as facts by our subconscious. That subconscious, which is unable to edit the information it hears, stores all these facts. In so doing, it creates within our aura a field that magnetizes to us whatever we believe to be true. What we believe is possible for ourselves, and what we think we want are too often very different.

If, from the information it has received, your mind has decided that the world is a very scary place full of unscrupulous people, for example, that is precisely what you will attract. If your information has been deciphered to mean that all men are untrustworthy lechers, or all women are gold diggers, that is what will be magnetized to you by the field that has been created. If you have accepted a belief that you’ll have to work hard to make ends meet financially, that is what you’ll create.

Do you really want to keep creating “hard luck” because somewhere along the line your subconscious accepted the belief that your life is always going to be “a hard row to hoe”? If you look carefully, you will see that all these negative perceptions are fear based. Even now we are still being programmed in fear. For example, we are being told constantly that dark skinned, turbaned people are to be feared as potential terrorists. That, is a very big, and in most cases, an incorrect assumption.

I believe that we come here to learn. I also believe that we have a choice as to how we learn. We can learn through pain or joy. If your life’s lessons are a long string of painful events, you’ve accepted fear-based perceptions. You can only attract to yourself what your beliefs have programmed into your quantum resonance field. We create our reality, not by what we think, but by what we believe. The underlying belief will always win and become manifest.

If your lessons are being learned through pain, isn’t it about time that you decided to question your beliefs and learn through joy? If what is in your mind is not empowering, it is a belief, most likely originally belonging to someone else. Those beliefs can be changed. You just have to recognize that you can change dis-empowering beliefs. If you change your mind, you change your beliefs and so your quantum resonance field is changed. Voila, you attract something new.

Look around you. Misery likes company. If you are not surrounded by helpful, empowering people, if you see only struggling individuals, you’re in the wrong ballpark. Those who have given up on their dreams and have given in to struggle cannot support you in attaining your dreams. Adjust your beliefs and move to a new playing field.

It is within your power to examine your beliefs, discard the fear and pain beliefs, and replace them with empowering ones.

Valerie F Hansen is a certified hypnotherapist, master practitioner of NLP and a communication skills expert. Valerie has been studying, working, teaching and writing about inspirational and metaphysical topics for over thirty years. She has written a popular weekly newspaper column for six years, been a radio call in personality and has guested on over 30 TV and radio shows. Her website, http://www.mind-med.com features free articles and other interesting items.

  • Share/Bookmark
Thursday, December 25th, 2008 | Author: admin

This is a must see video – Please follow on through to the 12 part series.

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tSk51Lp-vHU&feature=PlayList&p=B13F881195866370&index=0

posterrabbitdvd-large
 

What the BLEEP Do We Know — First released in theaters in 2004, WTBDWK!? went on to become one of the most successful documentaries of all time. Now distributed in over 30 countries, it has stunned audiences with its revolutionary cinematic blend of dramatic film, documentary, animation and comedy, while serving up a mind-jarring blend of Quantum Physics, spirituality, neurology and evolutionary thought.

  • Share/Bookmark
Friday, July 11th, 2008 | Author: admin

One Big Bang, or were there many?

http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2006/may/05/spaceexploration.universe
· New theory tries to solve problem Einstein raised
· Universe may be much older, say cosmologists

The universe is at least 986 billion years older than physicists thought and is probably much older still, according to a radical new theory.

The revolutionary study suggests that time did not begin with the big bang 14 billion years ago. This mammoth explosion which created all the matter we see around us, was just the most recent of many.

The standard big bang theory says the universe began with a massive explosion, but the new theory suggests it is a cyclic event that consists of repeating big bangs.

“People have inferred that time began then, but there really wasn’t any reason for that inference,” said Neil Turok, a theoretical physicist at the University of Cambridge, “What we are proposing is very radical. It’s saying there was time before the big bang.”

Under his theory, published today in the journal Science with Paul Steinhardt at Princeton University in New Jersey, the universe must be at least a trillion years old with many big bangs happening before our own. With each bang, the theory predicts that matter keeps on expanding and dissipating into infinite space before another horrendous blast of radiation and matter replenishes it. “I think it is much more likely to be far older than a trillion years though,” said Prof Turok. “There doesn’t have to be a beginning of time. According to our theory, the universe may be infinitely old and infinitely large.”

Today most cosmologists believe the universe will carry on expanding until all the stars burn out, leaving nothing but their cold dead remains. But there is an inherent problem with this picture. The Cosmological Constant – a mysterious force first postulated by Albert Einstein that appears to be driving the galaxies apart – is much too small to fit the theory. Einstein later renounced it as his “biggest blunder”.

The Cosmological Constant is a mathematical representation of the energy of empty space, also known as “dark energy”, which exerts a kind of anti-gravity force pushing galaxies apart at an accelerating rate.

It happens to be a googol (1 followed by 100 zeroes) times smaller than would be expected if the universe was created in a single Big Bang. But its value could be explained if the universe was much, much older than most experts believe.

Mechanisms exist that would allow the Constant to decrease incrementally through time. But these processes would take so long that, according to the standard theory, all matter in the universe would totally dissipate in the meantime.

Turok and Steinhardt’s theory is an alternative to another explanation called the “anthropic principle”, which argues that the constant can have a range of values in different parts of the universe but that we happen to live in a region conducive to life.

“The anthropic explanations are very controversial and many people do not like them,” said Alexander Vilenkin a professor of theoretical physics at Tufts University in Massachusetts. Rather than making precise predictions for features of the universe the anthropic principle gives a vague range of values so it is difficult for physicists to test, he added.

“It’s absolutely terrible, it really is giving up,” said Prof Turok, “It’s saying that we are never going to understand the state of the universe. It just has to be that way for us to exist.” His explanation by contrast is built up from first principles.

But if he’s right, how long have we got until the next big bang? “We can’t predict when it will happen with any precision – all we can say is it won’t be within the next 10 billion years.” Good job, because if we were around we would instantly disintegrate into massless particles of light.

  • Share/Bookmark
Category: Physics  | Leave a Comment